Placement Software for Speed-to-Candidate
In staffing, the firm that responds to a candidate first usually places them. We build the systems that respond first and keep the pipeline honest.
Candidates ghost slow processes
A strong candidate who applies and hears nothing for three days has three other offers in motion.
The pipeline lives in inboxes
Who’s screened, who’s submitted, who’s waiting on feedback? The answer shouldn’t require asking three recruiters.
Screening is a bottleneck at scale
High-volume roles bury recruiters in near-identical CVs while the best candidates wait.
Candidate engagement agents
Instant response to every application: qualification questions asked, availability captured, interviews scheduled.
Pipeline dashboards
Every candidate, stage and stall in one view, so follow-ups happen before the ghosting does.
Screening automation
Structured summaries against your criteria, so recruiters read ten strong profiles instead of two hundred CVs.
Shipped systems built on the same architecture:
Falsa: qualification in conversation
Our bot qualifies property buyers’ intent and budget in chat and routes warm ones to a human. Swap buyers for candidates.
NYC Limo: 100K+ leads without leaks
Pipeline visibility plus automated follow-up at serious volume.
Price your speed-to-candidate fix.
Common questions
Can AI screening be fair and useful?
We build screening that structures and summarizes — availability, requirements, experience against your criteria — and leaves decisions to humans. Structured beats gut-feel for fairness, and recruiters stop reading 200 CVs to find 10.
Do you integrate with our ATS?
Yes. We extend the systems you already run — ATS, job boards, calendars — instead of replacing them.
What does recruiting automation cost?
Candidate engagement bots start around $3k–$5k; pipeline dashboards and screening systems scale with volume and integrations.